Title: "Tenderized for Tickling: Quantifying Bastinado-Induced Hyper-Susceptibility in Plantar Ticklish Response - A Dual-Phase BDSM Protocol Analysis"

Phase One: The Impact Table

Phase Two: The Tickle Table

Abstract
This study examines how controlled bastinado (impact-based foot discipline) amplifies ticklish response in a restrained female specimen. Using a 25-year-old hyper-ticklish subject (designation: Angel) under lab-grade bondage constraints, we quantify sensitivity escalation across two phases: 1) mechanical tenderization via impact/pressure tools, and 2) systematic sole-tickling. Key metrics included erythema progression, laughter frequency, and withdrawal attempt intensity.

Methodology

Apparatus

Tickle Table v2: 35° incline restraint system with steel-shanked ankle stocks & toe-mounted T-Bar ratchet Phase 1 Tools: Calibrated wooden ruler (22cm), leather riding crop (45cm), dual-head stainless steel pinwheel Phase 2 Tools: Manual digital stimulation, stiff 6 inch feather, Terrorizer 1.0 gloves, and Bad Vibrations. Monitoring: 4K close-up plantar cameras, laughter decibel sensors, perspiration trackers

Variables

Impact Randomization: Strikes delivered at 7-23 second intervals ( M=14.6s ) with pressure variance ( 2.4-4.1N ) Tickle Patterns: Alternating slow/fast strokes (radial vs. longitudinal sole mapping) Safety Protocol: Emergency clicker (Subject-held, 98g activation pressure)

Procedure

Phase 1 (Tenderization)

Specimen secured in supine position with toes hyperextended via T-Bar Impact Sequence: 10min ruler strikes (metatarsal focus) 5min alternating crop/pinwheel application (arch/heel emphasis) Sensitivity checks every 120s using feather grazes (3s duration) Erythema documented via spectrophotometer

Phase 2 (Tickling Evaluation)

Immediate transition post-impact ( <15s delay) Stimuli applied in escalating intensity: Level 1: Manual digital stimulation (fingers) Level 2: Stiff feather application. Feathering tip only along the arch area, horizontal ‘sawing’ motion among interdigital spaces. Level 3: Terrorizer gloves 1.0 Level 4: Bad vibrations barely applied along toe tips with minimal contact. Psychological ploy - maddening light touch. Response metrics recorded until safeword activation

Results

Laughter Bursts: 47% increase vs. baseline ( p <0.01 ) Toe Splay: 28° maximum separation during Level 3 stimuli Perspiration: 0.9μS/cm conductivity spike Key Observation: Arch sensitivity increased 62% post-tenderization ( p <0.001 )

Discussion
Data confirms bastinado significantly amplifies ticklish response through:

Capillary Dilation: Erythema correlated with heightened nerve exposure ( r=0.89 ) Psychological Priming: Anticipatory trembling increased stimulus receptivity Mechanical Sensitization: Impact-induced dermal tautness improved claw/bristle friction

Notable limitations include single-subject design and possible endorphin interference.

Conclusion
Bastinado protocols effectively "prime" submissive specimens for intensified tickling sessions. Practitioners should:

Alternate impact/tickle intervals ≤20s Target metatarsal pads for maximum sensitivity gain Monitor toe splay as real-time receptivity indicator

Further research needed on long-term desensitization thresholds.

The Angel Experiment Phase One